Leaders of Soviet Georgia, Armenia and Azerbaijan at Sardarabad memorial in early 1980s.
Leaders of Soviet Georgia, Armenia and Azerbaijan at Sardarabad memorial in early 1980s.

Karabakh and more broadly the Caucasus region were examined in several panels at the annual Association for the Study of Nationalities (ASN) convention held May 4-6 at Columbia University in New York.

Arsène Saparov of the University of Sharjah spoke on “Re-negotiating the Boundaries of Permissible: The National(ist) Revival in Soviet Armenia and Moscow’s Response.” Saparov is author of a key recent work on early Soviet Karabakh history “Why Autonomy? The Making of Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Region 1918-1925.”

Daniel Pommier of Sapienza University of Rome presented on “Wilsonian Azerbaijan: the Azerbaijani Delegation to the Paris Peace Conference in the Topçubaşov Archives,” drawing on the archives of a key figure in the Azerbaijani Democratic Republic of 1918-1920.

Maxim Tabachnik of the University of California, Santa Cruz discussed “Nation-Building in the Face of Frozen Conflicts in the Caucasus: Politics of Territorial Citizenship in Azerbaijan and Georgia,” and Jane Kitaevich of the University of Michigan sought to answer the question “Do Frozen Conflicts Render States Less Accountable?: Re-Examining The Foundation of Social Contract through Public Goods Provision in Armenia and Nagorno-Karabakh.” The latter research was supported by the USC Institute of Armenian Studies.

The Institute fellow Karena Avedissian served as discussant in a panel on minorities in the Caucasus and presented on “Learning from Failure: Social Movement Formation in Kabardino-Balkaria,” a republic in Russia’s Caucasus.